|
|




| |
 |
The greatest impact of the Schools Attuned Program occurs
when the principles and
content are integrated into professional judgment and practice.
The Management by Profile protocol supports this integration
by providing a framework for educators to apply a neurodevelopmental lens to
their thinking and decision-making about learning and learners. Management by
Profile guides practitioner thinking through four key components:
| |
> |
Observation – What patterns do I
observe regarding the student’s engagement with the curriculum and instruction? |
| |
> |
Neurodevelopmental Analysis – What
do these patterns tell me about the demands of the curriculum and instruction
and the strengths and weaknesses of the student? |
| |
> |
Management – Based on a
neurodevelopmental analysis, how can I help this student better understand
himself as a learner and what strategies can we identify to support this
student in achieving academic and social success? What will success look like? |
| |
> |
Measurement of Impact – What
results did we find after the implementation of management strategies? What did
we learn and what are our next steps? |
Using observable phenomena to understand a student’s neurodevelopmental profile
and how these strengths and weaknesses interact with the demands of school, and
making decisions about the management of that interaction, is at the core of
the Management by Profile protocol.
Using Management by Profile as a foundational thought process, Schools Attuned
provides educators with specific processes and tools to apply this thinking to
their daily work, including:
Lesson Analysis/Subject Analysis – a process for applying
Management by Profile to understanding one’s curriculum and instructional
decisions.
As participants work through the lesson analysis or subject analysis process,
they begin to understand the role of the neurodevelopmental Constructs and
Functions in their curriculum and instruction, why students may be struggling
in their class, and how they can help all students achieve greater success.
Student Learning Partnership – a process that helps teachers
apply the Management by Profile Protocol to their work with individual
students.
The Student Learning Partnership supports teachers in using their knowledge of
the neurodevelopmental Constructs and the demands of their curriculum, as well
as their observations of a student in their classroom, to conduct a series of
conversations with a struggling student about his or her learning. Teacher and
student work together in an age-appropriate way to develop an idea about the
neurodevelopmental issues that might be causing the difficulty. Through the use
of journals, reflection tools, work samples, and conversations, evidence is
gathered and recurring themes identified to support a plan of action. As a
result, students receive the one-on-one attention they need to succeed in a
targeted area of weakness and build the age-appropriate self-advocacy skills
that prepare them for success in school and in life.
Attuning a
Student – a process for collecting and interpreting data
to develop a hypothesis about a student’s comprehensive neurodevelopmental
profile.
The Attuning a Student process supports a commitment among students, educators,
and parents to address the full range of neurodevelopmental profiles and
academic abilities possessed by students. Through this systematic process,
educators, students, and parents work collaboratively to understand a student’s
learning profile and make evidence-based decisions regarding the best plan for
managing that profile in areas of school performance. The process of Attuning a
Student provides tools to empower teachers to be careful observers, accurately
describing students' strengths and concerns rather than relying on diagnostic
labels. The process also considers students' personal accounts of their
experiences as learners and acknowledges the value of parents' observations and
impressions of their children's learning. These multiple perspectives enable
teachers to search for recurring themes that can provide insight into students'
learning.
 |
 |
|
|
|